1)The 'good guys' use REAL 'Bombs' - only evil terrorists use IED's - because they are the bad guys
2)They are also bad guys because they refuse to fight fair by the definition of the "Coalition' occupying armies - this is very bad, and shows a weak moral war compass.
3)The media uses IED, because it sounds cool, and shows that they appreciate the briefings they get from the good guys. They demonstrate their gratitude by turning off their camera as the Governor General is toured through the army vehicles that have been damaged by the 'bad evil guys' IED's - if they didn't, one might begin to wonder just who is good, and who is bad - which is a slippery slope.
Remember kids - Bombs=Good (esp. the new smart bombs that only kill bad guys and women and children who will at some point in the future become bad guys for sure)IED's=Bad - unfair evil war cheating terrorists heroically fighting the Western occupying armies in their own country... (Oh wait, I'm getting confused here) Bombs=Good, IED's=Bad, UsGood, ThemBad - always remember kids - the 'Other' is always bad.
27 March 2007
A Monty Python take on IEDs
Here is TagBagger's Pythonesque take on IEDs (Improvised Explosive Devices) which we banned in the previous post. Cynical? Or just calling a bomb a bomb. It was pulled out of GT comments.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
Don't forget uniforms:
Uniforms = army = Good,
No uniforms = terrorist = Evil.
We tend to think of things as a spectrum, like politics, a line with left at one end and right at the other, when it is really a circle - and somewhere on the circle the worlds of Monty Python and George (1984) Orwell are exactly beside each other, just as they so clearly and tragically are meeting in Iraq and the ❝War on Terror™❞
No it isn't.
Yes it is.
Sorry, times up. I'm not allowed to argue with you until you pay me.
Sorry, this is abuse, not arguments.
Ha, if this is abuse then why aren't you abusing me?!
I'm right 10 000 times + 1 more than you, poophead!
are you two related?
Only in our Pythonhood. But you're in that family too, aren't you YAM?
You're a bigger poophead
TB, can you please wade in here and elevate this discussion back to it's lofty heights?
This discussion never was at a lofty height. And you owe me $5.00 for the argument.
The War On Terror™ - Do you suppose I could trademark that phrase? Or am I too late?
Since it's abuse not arguments, I do not owe you a fiver.
And no, you cannot trademark WOT because it was banned by GT.
Words that should be banned: War on Terror
But try down hall in the Phrases-created-to-encompass-anyone-as-enemy -in-case-you-need-to-start-a-war Room.
I'm sure they can help you trademark something.
Can't get the link to work, but look in the margin under Words that Should be banned; it's the fourth one down
Post a Comment